Abstract
AbstractWe discuss the case against Factorism, which is the standard assumption in quantum mechanics that the labels of the $$\otimes$$
⊗
-factor Hilbert-spaces in direct-product Hilbert-spaces of composite physical systems of similar particles refer to particles, either directly or descriptively. We distinguish different versions of Factorism and argue for their truth or falsehood. In particular, by introducing the concepts of snapshot Hilbert-space and Schrödinger-movie, we demonstrate that there are Hilbert-spaces and $$\otimes$$
⊗
-factorisations where the labels do refer, even descriptively, to similar particles, which renders them probabilistically absolutely discernible.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference29 articles.
1. Bigaj, T. (2015a). Dissecting weak discernibility of quanta. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 50, 43–53.
2. Bigaj, T. (2015b). Exchanging quantum particles. Philosophia Scientae, 19(1), 185–198.
3. Butterfield, J. (1993). Interpretation and identity in quantum theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 24, 443–476.
4. Caulton, A. (2012). Qualitatively individuating so-called indistinguishable quantum systems. Talk at Cambridge University, 27 April 2012.
5. Caulton, A. (2013). Discerning indistinguishable quantum systems. Philosophy of Science, 80, 49–72.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献