Fallibilism versus Relativism in the Philosophy of Science-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Fallibilism versus Relativism in the Philosophy of Science

Published:2021-09-27 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0925-4560
Container-title:Journal for General Philosophy of Science
language:en
Short-container-title:J Gen Philos Sci

Author:

Stump David J.^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10838-021-09579-x.pdf

Reference38 articles.

1. Bloor, David. 1999a. Anti-Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30 (1): 81–112.

2. Bloor, David. 1999b. Reply to Bruno Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30 (1): 131–136.

3. Bloor, David. 2020. Relativism and Antinomianism. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism, ed. Martin Kusch, 388–397. London and New York: Routledge.

4. Boghossian, Paul. 2006. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

5. Chang, Hasok. 1993. A Misunderstood Rebellion: The Twin-Paradox Controversy and Herbert Dingle’s Vision of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24: 741–790.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pragmatism Versus Social Construction: A Reply to Shahryari;Journal for General Philosophy of Science;2023-12-07

2. Absolutism, Relativism, and Pragmatic Fallibilism: A Reply to Stump;Journal for General Philosophy of Science;2023-02-24

3. Ludwik Fleck’s reasonable relativism about science;Synthese;2023-01-21