1. Arthur, R. (2008). Leery Bedfellows: Newton and Leibniz on the status of infinitesimals. In Ursula Goldenbaum & Douglas Jesseph (Eds.), Infinitesimal differences: Controversies between Leibniz and his contemporaries (pp. 7–30). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
2. Bair, J., Błaszczyk, P., Ely, R., Henry, V., Kanovei, V., Katz, K., Katz, M., Kutateladze, S., McGaffey, T., Schaps, D., Sherry, D. & Shnider, S. (2013). Is mathematical history written by the victors? Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 60(7), 886–904.
3. Bascelli, T., Bottazzi, E., Herzberg, F., Kanovei, V., Katz, K., Katz, M., et al. (2014). Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, and the gang: The true history of the concepts of limit and shadow. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 61(8), 848–864.
4. Bascelli, T., Błaszczyk, P., Kanovei, V., Katz, K., Katz, M., Schaps, D. & Sherry, D. (2016). Leibniz vs Ishiguro: Closing a quarter-century of syncategoremania. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 6(1), 117–147.
5. Beckmann, F. (1967/1968). Neue Gesichtspunkte zum 5. Buch Euklids. Archive for History Exact Sciences, 4, 1–144.