Abstract
AbstractThis article connects recent work in formal epistemology to work in economics and computer science. Analysing the Dutch Book Arguments, Epistemic Utility Theory and Objective Bayesian Epistemology we discover that formal epistemologists employ the same argument structure as economists and computer scientists. Since similar approaches often have similar problems and have shared solutions, opportunities for cross-fertilisation abound.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Università degli Studi di Milano
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference102 articles.
1. Abrache, J., T. G. Crainic, M. Gendreau, and M. Rekik. 2007. Combinatorial auctions. Annals of OR 153 (1): 131–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0179-z.
2. Binmore, K. 1987. Modeling rational players: Part I. Economics and Philosophy 3 (2): 179–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100002893.
3. Bradley, S. 2015. Imprecise Probabilities. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta, Summer 2015 edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/imprecise-probabilities.
4. Branco, F. 1997. The design of multidimensional auctions. The Rand journal of economics 28 (1): 63–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2555940.
5. Buettner, R., and J. Landes. 2012. Web service based applications for electronic labor markets: A multi-dimensional price VCG auction with individual utilities. In Proceedings of ICIW, 168–177. http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article &articleid=iciw_2012_6_20_20045.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献