National UK Survey of Radiation Doses During Endovascular Aortic Interventions
-
Published:2023-11-15
Issue:1
Volume:47
Page:92-100
-
ISSN:0174-1551
-
Container-title:CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
Author:
Tsitsiou YvonneORCID, Velan Bar, Ross Rebecca, Lakshminarayan Raghu, Rogers Andy, Hamady Mohamad, Khan Lamran, Krishnan Ananth, Hennessy Martin, Kasthuri Ram, Al-Rekabi Zenaib, Abisi Said, Hampshire Mark, Goutzios Panos, Hanif Muhammad, Olivier Emma, Wood Andrew, Macey Andrew, Modi Sachin, Allison Robert, Bent Clare, Bungay Peter, Whiteman Robert, Williams Robin, Aldin Zaid, Weaver Josephine, Kaikini Robert, Wells David, Hancock John, Madhavan Anil, Puppala Sapna, Matson Matthew, Lewis Katharine, Uberoi Raman, Winterbottom Andrew, Huasen Bella, Jenkins Michael, Cleveland Trevor, Butcher Rachel,
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Endovascular aortic repair (EAR) interventions, endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), are associated with significant radiation exposures. We aimed to investigate the radiation doses from real-world practice and propose diagnostic reference level (DRL) for the UK.
Materials and Methods
Radiation data and essential demographics were retrospectively collected from 24 vascular and interventional radiology centres in the UK for all patients undergoing EAR—standard EVAR or complex, branched/fenestrated (BEVAR/FEVAR), and TEVAR—between 2018 and 2021. The data set was further categorised according to X-ray unit type, either fixed or mobile. The proposed national DRL is the 75th percentile of the collective medians for procedure KAP (kerma area product), cumulative air kerma (CAK), fluoroscopy KAP and CAK.
Results
Data from 3712 endovascular aortic procedures were collected, including 2062 cases were standard EVAR, 906 cases of BEVAR/FEVAR and 509 cases of TEVAR. The majority of endovascular procedures (3477/3712) were performed on fixed X-ray units. The proposed DRL for KAP was 162 Gy cm2, 175 Gy cm2 and 266 Gy cm2 for standard EVAR, TEVAR and BEVAR/FEVAR, respectively.
Conclusion
The development of DRLs is pertinent to EAR procedures as the first step to optimise the radiation risks to patients and staff while maintaining the highest patient care and paving the way for steps to reduce radiation exposures.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference34 articles.
1. Sweeting MJ, Patel R, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients physically ineligible for open repair. Ann Surg. 2017;266(5):713–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002392. 2. Foerth M, Seidenbusch MC, Sadeghi-Azandaryani M, Lechel U, Treitl KM, Treitl M. Typical exposure parameters, organ doses and effective doses for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: comparison of Monte Carlo simulations and direct measurements with an anthropomorphic phantom. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(9):2617–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3673-8. 3. Hertault A, Rhee R, Antoniou GA, Adam D, Tonda H, Rousseau H, et al. Radiation dose reduction during EVAR: results from a prospective multicentre study (The REVAR Study). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(3):426–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.05.001. 4. Rial R, Vañó E, Del Río-Solá ML, Fernández JM, Sánchez RM, Camblor Santervás LA, et al. National diagnostic reference levels for endovascular aneurysm repair and optimisation strategies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;60(6):837–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.08.006. 5. Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, Rehani MM, Kang K, Rosenstein M, et al. ICRP publication 135: diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP. 2017;46(1):1–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645317717209.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|