Abstract
AbstractConsider three closed linear subspaces $$C_1, C_2,$$
C
1
,
C
2
,
and $$C_3$$
C
3
of a Hilbert space H and the orthogonal projections $$P_1, P_2$$
P
1
,
P
2
and $$P_3$$
P
3
onto them. Halperin showed that a point in $$C_1\cap C_2 \cap C_3$$
C
1
∩
C
2
∩
C
3
can be found by iteratively projecting any point $$x_0 \in H$$
x
0
∈
H
onto all the sets in a periodic fashion. The limit point is then the projection of $$x_0$$
x
0
onto $$C_1\cap C_2 \cap C_3$$
C
1
∩
C
2
∩
C
3
. Nevertheless, a non-periodic projection order may lead to a non-convergent projection series, as shown by Kopecká, Müller, and Paszkiewicz. This raises the question how many projection orders in $$\{1,2,3\}^{\mathbb {N}}$$
{
1
,
2
,
3
}
N
are “well behaved” in the sense that they lead to a convergent projection series. Melo, da Cruz Neto, and de Brito provided a necessary and sufficient condition under which the projection series converges and showed that the “well behaved” projection orders form a large subset in the sense of having full product measure. We show that also from a topological viewpoint the set of “well behaved” projection orders is a large subset: it contains a dense $$G_\delta $$
G
δ
subset with respect to the product topology. Furthermore, we analyze why the proof of the measure theoretic case cannot be directly adapted to the topological setting.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC