Abstract
AbstractMosses are key components of many ecosystems and particularly related to water cycling. In principle, the importance of mosses for water-related processes is known; however, their influence is rarely quantified in scientific studies. To fill this research gap, this study concentrates on the influence of mosses of different species on surface runoff, the amount of percolated water, soil loss, and the temporal dynamics of soil water content. For this purpose, an experimental approach consisting of an ex situ rainfall simulation (45 mm h− 1 for 30 min) with infiltration boxes equipped with biocrust wetness probes was applied. On average, mosses significantly reduced surface runoff by 91% and soil loss by almost 100%, while the amount of percolated water was increased by 85% compared with bare soils. These processes were superimposed by desiccation cracks, and partly water repellency, with the result that the respective influences could not be quantified individually. However, by simultaneously measuring the water content in the substrates during rainfall simulations, we were able to achieve a better understanding of the water flows in the substrates. For instance, water content at 3 cm substrate depth was higher under mosses than in bare soils, implying that mosses facilitated infiltration. In this study, we were able to demonstrate that mosses play an important role in soil hydrology and in protecting the soil from erosion, and it is imperative that further experiments will be conducted to elucidate the apparently underestimated effects of mosses and their specific traits on soil water fluxes and sediment transport.
Funder
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Belnap J, Büdel B, Lange OL (2001) Biological Soil Crusts: Characteristics and Distribution. In: Belnap, J., and Lange, O. L. (Eds.) Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN 9783642564758
2. Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Arnold, K. (Ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, American Society of Agronomy, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, ISBN 9780891180883
3. Bu C, Wu S, Han F, Yang Y, Meng J (2015) The combined effects of moss-dominated biocrusts and vegetation on erosion and soil moisture and implications for disturbance on the Loess Plateau, China. PLoS ONE 10(5):e0127394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127394
4. Dekker L, Jungerius P (1990) Water repellency in the dunes with special reference to The Netherlands. In: Bakker, T. W., Jungerius, P. D., and Klijn, A. J. (Eds.) Dunes of European Coasts; Geomorphology - Hydrology - Soils, Catena-Verlag, Cremlingen-Destedt, Germany, ISBN 9783923381234
5. Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ, Oostindie K, Moore D, Wesseling JG (2009) Methods for determining soil water repellency on field-moist samples. Water Resour Res 45(4):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007070
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献