Abstract
AbstractWe report a numerical evaluation of the impact of continuous helical baffle on the heat recovery efficiency of counterflow tube bundle heat exchangers. The baffle inclination angle has been varied from $$11^{\circ }$$
11
∘
to $$22^{\circ }$$
22
∘
. Since the fluid flows over the tube bundle at an angle due to helical flow inside the shell, the heat exchanger operates in cross counter mode. Fluent simulations with the k-$$\omega$$
ω
transition shear stress transport turbulence model have been performed to investigate the thermal-hydraulic parameters of the system in terms of heat recovery efficiency, pressure loss, and overall heat transfer rate. Outside air temperature has been varied to mimic cold and warm weather. Pressure loss has been constrained to be less than 250 Pa, conforming to EU guidelines for energy labeling of residential ventilation units. At the maximum volume flow rate of 40 m$$^3$$
3
/h, the device performed with over $$80\%$$
80
%
heat recovery efficiency for the considered temperature difference. Continuous helical baffles helped to improve convective heat transfer by reducing cross flow area and increasing velocity. Smaller angles result in greater pressure loss while having no discernible effect on heat recovery efficiency for the considered geometry. The analysis demonstrates the potential of a compact counterflowing recuperative heat exchanger with continuous helical baffles for decentralized ventilation systems and serves as a basis for further optimization.
Funder
Zentrales Innovationsprogramm Mittelstand
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Council of European Union (2018). Directive of the european parliament and of the council on the energy performance of buildings (recast) (COM/2021/802 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52021PC0802. Accessed 27 Dec 2023
2. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) (2010). Energy efficiency made in germany. https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/2010-energy-efficiency-made-in-germany.pdf?_blob=publicationFile&v=1. Accessed 27 Dec 2023
3. European Commission and Joint Research Centre and Martirano, G and Pignatelli, F and Vinci, F and Hernández Moral, G and Serna-González, V and Ramos-Díez, I and Valmaseda, C and Coors, V and Fitzky, M and Struck, C (2022). Comparative analysis of different methodologies and datasets for energy performance labelling of buildings. https://doi.org/10.2760/746342
4. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) (2022). Renewable energy sources in figures national and international developments, 2021. https://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/EE/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/Berichte/renewable-energy-sources-in-figures-2021.html
5. Bell, K. J. (2005). Heat exchanger design for the process industries. Journal of Heat Transfer, 126(6), 877–885. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1833366