Abstract
AbstractIn border areas, time and space are constantly suspended from the usual rules along a liminal pathway transforming status and identity. In order to understand how different regimes of mobility and reception influence the experience of time and the subjective actions of both asylum seekers arriving via the so-called Balkan route and Ukrainian refugees fleeing from the war, the paper puts forward an analysis of the multiple scales of migration and reception policies as historically situated practices. How and to what extent has the increasing role of the humanitarian regime contributed to improving or worsening the lives of asylum seekers in borderland places where the memory of wars, civil conflicts, and experiences of refoulement is very much alive? Building on a multilocal ethnography of the temporalities of migrants’ reception, the paper aims at disentangling the historical layers of hospitality in the northeastern Italian border areas of Trieste and Bolzano and the intersecting forms of (im)mobility at play. By addressing “reception” as an entanglement of spatial and temporal practices carried out by migrants, institutional, and humanitarian actors, we discuss not only how time reduces the existence of asylum seekers and Ukrainian refugees to an empty and meaningless human condition by exerting control over the subjective experiences, but also how the migrants’ experience of waiting translates into an active state of being with the creative potential to trigger new forms of sociality, solidarity, and senses of belonging.
Funder
Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Altin, R. (2024). Border heritages. Migration and displaced memories in Trieste Lexington Books. In publication Spring 2024.
2. Altin, R. (2017). Perpetually temporary shelter in Trieste. Forced Migration Review, 55, 39–40.
3. Altin, R., & degli Uberti, S. (2022). Placed in time. Migration policies and temporalities of (im)mobility across the Eastern European borders. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 24(3), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2021.2015662
4. Amnesty International Italia (2019). I sommersi dell’accoglienza. Le conseguenze del Decreto legge 113/2018 sul sistema di accoglienza italiano, report from https://immigrazione.it/docs/2020/amnesty-i-sommersi-dellaccoglienza.pdf
5. Andersson, R. (2014). Time and the migrant other: European border controls and the temporal economics of illegality. American Anthropologist, 116(4), 795–809.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献