“Let the State Decide It All for Me”: The Role of Migration and Integration Policy in the Decision-Making of Ukrainian Refugee Women in Germany

Author:

Lazarenko ValeriaORCID

Abstract

AbstractWhile German migration policies aim to provide temporary protection and integrate Ukrainian refugees into German society as early as possible, the procedures and ideas of integration might be perceived differently by the beneficiaries. The feeling of “permanent temporariness” has been persistent among Ukrainians since March 2022. In this situation, some of the refugees renounce their agency and put responsibility on decision-making onto the state, while others oppose the idea of “being integrated” since they see their time in Germany as temporary, and their future in Ukraine as soon as the security situation allows them to return.Drawing on the experiences of single Ukrainian women who received protection in Germany, the paper presents an anthropological perspective on person–state interactions in the context of refugees’ future-planning. How do German policies for supporting Ukrainian refugees impact their “stay or return” decision-making? Do the policies address their needs now and allow them to make investments for the future, or, on the contrary, contribute to their decision to return to Ukraine, which appears to be “simpler” and “more predictable”? How does the experience of going through bureaucratic procedures contribute to the sense of having agency and being capable of shaping their today and tomorrow? To answer these questions, I am going to present the reasonings and emotions concerning bureaucratic procedures that are closely intertwined with the planning of their future by Ukrainian refugees in Germany.

Funder

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference75 articles.

1. Ahmed, S. (2014). Not in the Mood. New Formations: a Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics, 82, 13–28.

2. Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso books.

3. Andersson, R. (2014). Time and the migrant other: European border controls and the temporal economics of illegality. American Anthropologist, 116(4), 795–809. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24476056

4. Andrews, J., Isański, J., Nowak, M., Sereda, V., Vacroux, A., & Vakhitova, H. (2023). Feminized forced migration: Ukrainian war refugees. Women’s Studies International Forum, 99, 102756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102756

5. Bauer, A. H., Tobias; Hutter, Christian; Weber, Enzo (2023). Search processes on the labor market during the COVID-19 pandemic. i. I.-L.-I. f. W. a. d. U. München. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/250927/1/CESifo-Forum-2021-04-p15-19.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3