The Political Integration of Immigrants: How Pre- and Postmigration Contexts Matter

Author:

Dollmann JörgORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis study examines the political integration of immigrants in Germany and asks whether immigrants and their descendants show similar rates of political participation and expression of political attitudes as the population without an immigrant background. Furthermore, the study focusses on the pre- and postmigration context of immigrants and analyses whether immigrants differ in their level of political integration depending on (1) whether they come from more or less authoritarian regimes and (2) whether they have experienced discrimination in the receiving context. Using data from CILS4EU-DE, with a large representative sample of (children of) immigrants and non-immigrants in Germany, we observe differences in the political integration between immigrants and non-immigrants only on the attitudinal level, with immigrants showing lower levels of political trust but also slightly higher levels of satisfaction with the democratic system in Germany. When focussing on the effects of the pre- and the postmigration context, we observe differential results for the behavioural and attitudinal dimension: when immigrants stem from more authoritarian countries as well as when they have experienced more discrimination in the receiving context, this seems to mobilise respondents with respect to their political behaviour; however, it results in lower levels of political integration on the attitudinal dimension.

Funder

Universität Mannheim

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Anthropology,Cultural Studies,Demography

Reference64 articles.

1. Adida, C.L., Laitin, D.D. & Valfort, M.-A. (2014). Muslims in France: identifying a discriminatory equilibrium. Journal of Population Economics, 27(4), 1039–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-014-0512-1

2. Andritzky, J., Bodo A., Christofzik, D. I. and Schmidt, C. M. (2016) Influx of refugees: Integration as a key challenge (no. 09/2016). Working Paper 09/2016. German Council of Economic Experts.

3. Barnes, S. H., Kaase, M., Allerbeck, K. R., Farah, B. G., Heunks, F., Ronald Inglehart, M., Jennings, K., Klingemann, H. D., Marsh, A., & Rosenmayr, L. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. Sage.

4. Bartram, D. (2019). The UK citizenship process: Political integration or marginalization? Sociology, 53(4), 671–688

5. Bevelander, P., & Pendakur, R. (2011). Voting and social inclusion in Sweden. International Migration, 49(4), 67–92

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3