Public Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism and Interculturalism in Australia

Author:

Elias AmanuelORCID,Mansouri Fethi,Sweid Reem

Abstract

AbstractThe growing intellectual and policy debate around optimal approaches to diversity governance, particularly in relation to criticism of multiculturalism, is now entering a new phase characterised by advocating alternative conceptual and policy paradigms most notably interculturalism. Proposing a conceptual complementarity approach, rather than dogmatically oppositional stances, this paper approaches interculturalism as offering heuristic additive values to multiculturalism. As the paper shows, the Australian context indeed offers an optimal case study for conceptualising and engaging with interculturalism within an otherwise resilient multicultural framework. Australia’s unique and strong multicultural ethos has combined with successful intercultural strategies at different levels of diversity governance, policy and practice across various sectoral terrains. This paper uses an online national survey to examine the public understanding of and attitudes towards multiculturalism and interculturalism as supposedly distinct yet interconnected policy tools relating to the ever-changing diversity governance agenda.

Funder

Research Institute on Social Cohesion (RIOSC), Department of Premier and Cabinet, Victoria.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Anthropology,Cultural Studies,Demography

Reference78 articles.

1. Abdallah-Pretceille, M. (2006). Interculturalism as a paradigm for thinking about diversity. Intercultural Education, 17(5), 475–483.

2. Ang, I., & Stratton, J. (1998). Multiculturalism in crisis: the new politics of race and national identity in Australia. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 2, 22–41.

3. Arsaratnam, L. A. (2013). A review of articles on multiculturalism in 35 years of IJIR. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(6), 676–685.

4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Census of Population and Housing 2016, QuickStats. Available at http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/036. Accessed 20 July 2017.

5. Ballantyne, G., and Malhi, A. (2017). Interculturalism: how diverse societies can do better than passive tolerance. The Conversation. 21 March.

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3