Supporting People Seeking Asylum in the Australian Community: A Service Provider Perspective

Author:

Lippi KehlaORCID,McKenzie HayleyORCID,McKay Fiona H.ORCID,Hanna LisaORCID

Abstract

AbstractDeterrence of asylum seekers, including via restrictive refugee determination processes, is increasingly common in many countries. In Australia, people who sought asylum by sea between 13 August 2012 and 1 January 2014 (the ‘legacy caseload’), have been subject to increasing restrictions on their social and economic rights. As a result, these people rely on support from non-government organisations, whilst they progress through Australia’s refugee determination process. This research explored service providers’ role in mediating the impacts of asylum policy on the legacy caseload. Findings from 20 in-depth, semi-structured interviews, conducted between December 2018 and February 2020, highlight how service providers in both statutory and community sectors in Victoria challenge and subvert deterrence policies, even as the policy environment constrains their ability to support people seeking asylum. To redress these constraints, increased availability of social supports for people seeking asylum, continuing and additional funding for non-government organisations, and increased support for workers across sectors are recommended by this study. Service providers play a crucial role in enabling the effective engagement of people seeking asylum with the refugee determination process. These findings serve as a further warning from countries seeking to emulate the ‘Australian model’ of harm.

Funder

Australian Government

Deakin University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference53 articles.

1. Apostolidou, Z. (2018). Australian asylum discourses permeating therapeutic work with asylum seekers: A thematic analysis of specialist practitioners’ experiences. Psychotherapy & Politics International, 16(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppi.1434

2. Apostolidou, Z., & Schweitzer, R. (2017). Practitioners’ perspectives on the use of clinical supervision in their therapeutic engagement with asylum seekers and refugee clients. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 45(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2015.1125852

3. Australian Human Rights Commission. (2013). Asylum seekers, refugees and human rights. Retrieved from https://humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/document/publication/snapshot_report_2013.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2024.

4. Australian Human Rights Commission. (2019). Lives on hold: Refugees and asylum seekers in the ‘legacy caseload’. Australian Human Rights Commission. Retrived from https://humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-07/AHRC_Lives_on_hold_2019_summary.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2024.

5. Australian Human Rights Commission. (2023). Commission commends High Court ruling on indefinite immigration detention. Australian Human Rights Commission. Australian Human Rights Commission. Retrieved 9 January from https://humanrights.gov.au/about/news/media-releases/commission-commends-high-court-ruling-indefinite-immigration-detention#:~:text=The%20landmark%20decision%20overturns%20almost,Australia%20in%20the%20foreseeable%20future.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3