Author:
Andrés A. Martín,Sánchez Quevedo M. J.,Tapia García J. M.,Silva-Mato A.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Statistics and Probability
Reference27 articles.
1. Barnard, G. A. (1947). Significance test 2×2 tables.Biometrika, 34:123–138.
2. Camilli, G. andHopkins, K. D. (1978). Applicability of chi-square to 2×2 contingency tables with small expected cell frequencies.Psychological Bulletin, 85:163–167.
3. Camilli, G. andHopkins, K. D. (1979). Testing for association in 2×2 contingency tables with very small samples sizes.Psychological Bulletin, 86(5):1011–1014.
4. Cochran, W. G. (1954). Some methods for strengthening the commonX 2 tests.Biometrics, 10:417–451.
5. Conover, W. J. (1954). Some reasons for not using the Yates' continuity corrections on 2×2 contingency tables.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69:374–376.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献