Prioritisation of indicators in SDG 4: Voluntary national reviews as a tool of soft governance

Author:

Smith William C.ORCID,Susu AdrianaORCID,Jackaria Ijaaz,Martinez Johanna BohorquezORCID,Qu Meihui,Niwa Misaki

Abstract

AbstractVoluntary national reviews (VNRs) are an important component of the follow-up and review process for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Presented by countries at the annual United Nations High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF), VNRs detail a country’s self-reported progress to peers. This voluntary process has been criticised for its weak accountability. Global governance literature, however, points to an increase in these “soft” governance mechanisms as well as the potential strategic benefits of this approach. Using a mix of logistic regression and document analysis, this study examined VNRs as a soft governance tool and a reflection of the governance mechanism of the SDGs. The authors examined the scope and content of VNR submissions from 2016 to 2022, with a deeper review of 2022, which focused on the global goal for education (SDG 4). Three types of soft governance – governing by goal-setting, by numbers and by morality – were used as lenses to make sense of the results. The authors’ findings demonstrate the ability of soft governance tools to bring together diverse actors around a broad set of goals, and how the power of numbers can influence which indicators countries report on in their VNR.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference71 articles.

1. Bandola-Gill, J., Grek, S., & Tichenor, M. (2022). Governing the Sustainable Development Goals: Quantification in global public policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03938-6

2. Bartl, W., Papilloud, C. & Terracher-Lipinski, A. (2019). Governing by numbers – key indicators and the politics of expectations. An introduction. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 44(2), 7–43. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.44.2019.2.7-43

3. Beisheim, M. (2016). Reviewing the implementation of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: “Early movers” can help maintain momentum (SWP Comments). Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Retrieved 17 May 2024 from https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/comments/2016C30_bsh.pdf

4. Beisheim, M. & Bernstein, S., (2020). The High-level Political Forum Review 2020: An opportunity to fulfill the HLPF’s mandate. In Friends of Governance for Sustainable Development (Ed.), Governance for Sustainable Development Volume 4: Challenges and Opportunities for Implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (pp. 138–145). Durham: New World Frontiers. Retrieved 17 May 2024 from https://friendsofgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Chapter-11-The-High-Level-Political-Forum-Review-2020-An-Opportunity-to-Fulfill-the-HLPF%E2%80%99s-Mandate-By-MB-and-SB.pdf

5. Beisheim, M., & Fritzsche, F. (2022). The UN High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development: An orchestrator, more or less? Global Policy, 13(5), 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13112

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3