Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference91 articles.
1. Abessa, Denis, Ana Famá, and Lucas Buruaem. 2019. The systematic dismantling of Brazilian environmental laws risks losses on all fronts. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3:510–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0855-9.
2. Acosta, Alberto. 2013. Extractivism and neoextractivism: two sides of the same curse. In Beyond development: alternative visions from latin America, ed. Imre Szűcs, 61–86. Quito, Amsterdam: Transnational Institute / Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
3. Andrade, Daniela. 2016. ‘Export or die’: the rise of Brazil as an agribusiness powerhouse. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 1:653–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2016.1353889.
4. Andrade, Daniela. 2019. Populism from above and below: the path to regression in Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1680542.
5. de Araújo, Suely Mara Vaz Guimarães. 2020. Environmental policy in the Bolsonaro government: the response of environmentalists in the legislative arena. Brazilian Political Science Review 14:e5. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202000020005.
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献