Dysfunctional democracy(ies): characteristics, causes and consequences

Author:

Stark Toralf,Osterberg-Kaufmann Norma,Pickel Susanne

Abstract

AbstractDemocratic systems are currently facing multiple challenges. A central component of this is the disintegrating relationship between citizens and political actors; citizens simply do not feel represented by political actors any longer. As a result, we are seeing a decline in trust in politicians, increasing questioning of whether democracy is still the best political system, and the question of whether citizens are not also developing a changed understanding of democracy. Research into the underlying causes of these developments inevitably leads to an analysis of the outcomes resulting from political activities, which, in addition to the desired results, also produce unintended consequences due to the complexity of politics and society (Almond et al., p. 32–34). In this case, we speak of dysfunction or dysfunctionality. In this paper, which also serves as an introduction to the special section “Dysfunctional democracy(ies): Characteristics, Causes and Consequences.” we give a brief overview of the concept of dysfunctionality of democratic systems in order to distinguish it from considerations of the deterioration of the quality of democracy. The focus of our reflections is not the institutional consequences of the various challenges. The focus is on why democratic systems are unable to adapt adequately to the demands of a changing environment and thus produce unintended outcomes that harm the democratic political system.

Funder

Universität Duisburg-Essen

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference55 articles.

1. Princeton Legacy Library;GA Almond,2015

2. Almond, Gabriel A., G.B. Powell, Russell J. Dalton, and Kaare Strøm. 2008. Comparing political systmes. In Comparative politics today: a world view, ed. Gabriel A. Almond, G.B. Powell, Russell J. Dalton, and Kaare York Strøm. New Munich, 28–42. Pearson: Longman.

3. Archibugi, Daniele. 2012. Cosmopolitan democracy: a restatement. Cambridge Journal of Education 42(1):9–20.

4. Bowen, Roger W. 2003. Japan’s dysfunctional democracy: the liberal democratic party and structural corruption. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315290331.

5. Coleman, Stephen. 2020. Dysfunctional democracy vs. direct representation. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies 9(2):215–226.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Conceptualizing Difference;Democratic Theory;2023-06-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3