Abstract
AbstractThe paper challenges the idea that using governing parties’ policy positions is necessarily desirable in quantitative analyses of partisan differences in public policies. Rather, for some research questions parties’ affiliation with certain party families is the preferable solution. The paper shows that the use of policy positions instead of party family affiliation shifts the research question from asking whether parties make a difference in public policy to the question whether parties in government do what they promise. This shift can have considerable analytical costs and can potentially blindfold scholars for certain dynamics. Moreover, the use of party family affiliation has less drawbacks than is often claimed even under multidimensional party competition if the simple distinction between left, center and right parties is abandoned and more fine-grained data for various party families are used.
Funder
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference43 articles.
1. Adams, James, Andrea B. Haupt, and Heather Stoll. 2009. What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 42(5):611–639.
2. Armingeon, Klaus, Sarah Engler, and Lucas Leemann. 2022. Supplement to the comparative political data set—Government composition 1960–2020. Zurich: Department of Political Science, University of Zurich.
3. Bakker, Ryan, and Sara Hobolt. 2013. Measuring party positions. In Political choice matters: explaining the strength of class and religious cleavages in cross-national perspective, ed. Evans Geoffrey, Dirk Nan de Graaf, 27–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Benoit, Kenneth R., and Michael Laver. 2006. Party policy in modern democracies. London: Routledge.
5. Benoit, Kenneth R., Michael Laver, and Slava Mikhaylov. 2009. Treating words as data with error: uncertainty in text statements of policy positions. American Journal of Political Science 53(2):495–513.