Abstract
AbstractStudy on applicability of two modal identification techniques in irrelevant cases is made in this paper. The following techniques are considered: peak picking based on correlation analysis (PP-CA), dedicated for ambient vibrations and eigensystem realization algorithm (ERA), formulated for free-decay vibrations investigation. Irrelevant cases are found when analyzed signals are different than recommended to a given technique. The study is conducted on examples of two real structures: masonry tower and steel railway bridge. Both cases are diverse in age, material, excitation and vibrations energy. The signals measured on the tower are suitable for the PP-CA technique (ambient vibrations), while the signals measured on the bridge are suitable for the ERA (free-decay vibrations). However, both methods have been applied to both systems. Natural frequencies, mode shapes and damping ratios are identified and the effectiveness of the irrelevant technique is assessed in relation to the results obtained by the relevant method in each case.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference30 articles.
1. Maia NMM, Silva JMM. Theoretical and experimental modal analysis. Baldock: Research Studies Press Ltd.; 1997.
2. Zhang L. An overview of major developments and issues in modal identification. In: Proceedings of 22nd international modal analysis conference (IMAC), Detroit; 2004.
3. Bendat J, Piersol A. Engineering applications of correlation and spectral analysis. New York: Wiley; 1980.
4. Zwolski J, Bień J. Modal analysis of bridge structures by means of forced vibration tests. J Civ Eng Manag. 2011;17(4):590–9.
5. Gazzani V, Poiani M, Clementi F, Milani G, Lenci S. Modal parameters identification with environmental tests and advanced numerical analyses for masonry bell towers: a meaningful case study. Procedia Struct Integr. 2018;11:306–13.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献