Are Moral Considerations Sufficient for Selecting Nonaversive Interventions?: A Review of Repp and Singh’s Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversive and Aversive Interventions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Are Moral Considerations Sufficient for Selecting Nonaversive Interventions?: A Review of Repp and Singh’s Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversive and Aversive Interventions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities

Published:1991-10 Issue:2 Volume:14 Page:219-224
ISSN:0738-6729
Container-title:The Behavior Analyst
language:en
Short-container-title:BEHAV ANALYST

Author:

Alberto Paul,Andrews Donna

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Clinical Psychology,Social Psychology

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF03392576.pdf

Reference5 articles.

1. Azrin, N., & Holtz, W. (1966). Punishment. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 213–270). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

2. Horner, R., Dunlap, G., Koegel, R., Carr, E., Sailor, W., Anderson, J., Albin, R., & O’Neill, R. (1990). Toward a technology of “nonaversive” behavioral support. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 125–132.

3. Repp, A. C., & Singh, N. N. (Eds.). (1990). Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing.

4. Simpson, R. (1991). Editor’s note. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 6, 1.

5. The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. (1986). Resolution on the Cessation of Intrusive Interventions.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The social validity of an argument supporting a ban on aversive procedures;Journal of Intellectual Disability Research;2008-06-28

2. Intervention Aversiveness: Educators' Perceptions of the Need for Restrictions on Aversive Interventions;Behavioral Disorders;1993-02