Funder
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Bioengineering Department
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Arts and Humanities
Reference38 articles.
1. Dombrowski PM. Can ethics be technologized? Lessons from challenger, philosophy, and rhetoric. IEEE Trans Profess Commun. 1995;38(3):146–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.406727.
2. Birsch D, Fielder JH. The Ford Pinto case: a study in applied ethics, business, and technology. In: Restivo S, Croissant J, editors. SUNY series, case studies in applied ethics, technology, and society. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1994.
3. Bielefeldt AR, Polmear M, Knight D, Canney N, Swan C. Disciplinary variations in ethics and societal impact topics taught in courses for engineering students. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 2019;145(4):04019007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000415.
4. Goldin IM, Pinkus RL, Ashley K. Validity and reliability of an instrument for assessing case analyses in bioengineering ethics education. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015;21(3):789–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9644-2.
5. Mitcham C, Englehardt EE. Ethics across the curriculum: prospects for broader (and deeper) teaching and learning in research and engineering ethics. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019;25(6):1735–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9797-7.