Great expectations: patients’ preferences for clinically significant results from genomic sequencing
-
Published:2023-03-21
Issue:4
Volume:142
Page:553-562
-
ISSN:0340-6717
-
Container-title:Human Genetics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hum Genet
Author:
Shickh Salma, Sebastian Agnes, Clausen Marc, Mighton Chloe, Elser Christine, Eisen Andrea, Waldman Larissa, Panchal Seema, Ward Thomas, Carroll June C., Glogowski Emily, Schrader Kasmintan A., Lerner-Ellis Jordan, Kim Raymond H., Thorpe Kevin E., Bombard YvonneORCID, Bombard Yvonne, Armel Susan R., Aronson Melyssa, Baxter Nancy N., Bond Kenneth, Capo-Chichi José-Mario, Carroll June C., Caulfield Timothy, Clausen Marc, Clifford Tammy, Cohn Iris, Dhalla Irfan, Earle Craig C., Eisen Andrea, Elser Christine, Evans Michael, Glogowski Emily, Graham Tracy, Greenfield Elena, Hamilton Jada G., Isaranuwatchai Wanrudee, Kastner Monica, Kim Raymond H., Laupacis Andreas, Lerner-Ellis Jordan, Morel Chantal F., Mujoomdar Michelle, Noor Abdul, Offit Kenneth, Panchal Seema, Robson Mark E., Scheer Adena, Scherer Stephen, Schrader Kasmintan A., Sullivan Terrence, Thorpe Kevin E.,
Funder
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Genetics
Reference39 articles.
1. Ackerman SL, Koenig BA (2018) Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratories. AJOB Empir Bioeth, 9(1): 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2017.1405095 2. Bennette CS, Trinidad SB, Fullerton SM, Patrick D, Amendola L, Burke W, Veenstra DL (2013) Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value--development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT). Genet Med, 15(11): 873–881. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.63 3. Best MC, Butow P, Savard J, Jacobs C, Bartley N, Davies G, Newson AJ (2022) Preferences for return of germline genome sequencing results for cancer patients and their genetic relatives in a research setting. Eur J Hum Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01069-y 4. Bishop CL, Strong KA, Dimmock DP (2017) Choices of incidental findings of individuals undergoing genome wide sequencing, a single center’s experience. Clin Genet 91(1):137–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12829 5. Bombard Y, Clausen M, Mighton C, Carlsson L, Casalino S, Glogowski E, Laupacis A (2018) The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results. Eur J Hum Genet 26(7):984–995. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0144-0
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|