Removal of Bisphenol A and Its Potential Substitutes by Biodegradation
-
Published:2020-01-20
Issue:3
Volume:191
Page:1100-1110
-
ISSN:0273-2289
-
Container-title:Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Appl Biochem Biotechnol
Author:
Frankowski Robert, Zgoła-Grześkowiak AgnieszkaORCID, Smułek Wojciech, Grześkowiak Tomasz
Abstract
AbstractThe possibility of removing bisphenol A and its five potential substitutes (bisphenols S, F, AF, E, and B) was tested using microorganism consortia from river water and activated sludge from municipal and rural wastewater treatment plants. For most bisphenols, biodegradation with activated sludge was faster than with river water and a greater extent of biodegradation was also achieved. However, only bisphenol A and bisphenol F underwent 100% primary biodegradation while other bisphenols degraded no more than about 50% which has some important implications in case of their increased usage. Metabolic activity in biodegradation liquors was also tested and it showed higher activity in the tests with activated sludge than with river water. However, there was no clear connection between the decline of metabolic activity and the extent of biodegradation as decreased activity was observed for two easily degrading bisphenols and two others with little biodegradability. It can be assumed that two different phenomena are involved in this process including depletion of nutrients for easily degradable bisphenol A and absence of nutrients for bacteria incapable of primary degradation of bisphenol AF and bisphenol S.
Funder
Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Molecular Biology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Biochemistry,General Medicine,Bioengineering,Biotechnology
Reference35 articles.
1. Dianin, A. (1892). Condensation products of ketones and phenols. Berichte der Deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin, 25, 334–337. 2. Eladak, S., Grisin, T., Moison, D., Guerquin, M. J., N’Tumba-Byn, T., Pozzi-Gaudin, S., Benachi, A., Livera, G., Rouiller-Fabre, V., & Habert, R. (2015). A new chapter in the bisphenol A story: bisphenol S and bisphenol F are not safe alternatives to this compound. Fertility and Sterility, 103(1), 11–21. 3. Staples, C. A., Dorn, P. B., Klecka, G. M., O’Block, S. T., & Harris, L. R. (1998). A review of the environmental fate, effects, and exposures of bisphenol A. Chemosphere, 36(10), 2149–2173. 4. Vos, J. G., Dybing, E., Greim, H. A., Landefoged, O., Lambre, C., & Tarazona, J. V. (2000). Health effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on wildlife, with special reference to the European situation. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 30(1), 71–133. 5. Dodds, E. C., & Lawson, W. (1938). Molecular structure in relation to oestrogenic activity. Compounds without a phenanthrene nucleus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 125, 222–232.
Cited by
51 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|