Abstract
AbstractThe transonic flight regime is often dominated by transonic buffet, a highly unsteady and complex shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction involving major parts of the flow field. The phenomenon is associated with a large-amplitude periodic motion of the compression shock coupled with large-scale flow separation and intermittent re-attachment. Due to the resulting large-scale variation of the global flow topology, also the turbulent wake of the airfoil or wing is severely affected, and so are any aerodynamic devices downstream on which the wake impinges. To analyze and understand the turbulent structures and dynamics of the wake, we performed a comprehensive experimental study of the near wake of the supercritical OAT15A airfoil in transonic buffet conditions at a chord Reynolds number of $$2\times 10^{6}$$
2
×
10
6
. Velocity field measurements reveal severe global influences of the buffet mode on both the surface-bound flow field on the suction side of the airfoil and the wake. The flow is intermittently strongly separated, with a significant momentum deficit that extends far into the wake. The buffet motion induces severe disturbances and variations of the turbulent flow, as shown on the basis of phase-averaged turbulent quantities in terms of Reynolds shear stress and RMS-values. The spectral nature of downstream-convecting fluctuations and turbulent structures are analyzed using high-speed focusing schlieren sequences. Analyses of the power spectral density pertaining to the vortex shedding in the direct vicinity of the trailing edge indicate dominant frequencies one order of magnitude higher than those associated with shock buffet ($$St_c=\mathcal {O}({1})$$
S
t
c
=
O
(
1
)
) vs. $$St_c=\mathcal {O}({0.1})$$
S
t
c
=
O
(
0.1
)
). It is shown that the flapping motion of the shear layer is accompanied by the formation of a von Kármán-type vortex street of fluctuating strength. These wake structures and dynamics will impact any downstream aerodynamic devices affected by the wake. Our study, therefore, allows conclusions regarding the incoming flow of devices such as the tail plane.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
RWTH Aachen University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Aerospace Engineering,Transportation
Reference37 articles.
1. McDevitt, J.B., Okuno, A.F.: Static and dynamic pressure measurements on a naca 0012 airfoil in the ames high Reynolds number facility. NASA Technical Paper 2485 (1985)
2. Molton, P., Dandois, J., Lepage, A., Brunet, V., Bur, R.: Control of buffet phenomenon on a transonic swept wing. AIAA J. 51(4), 761–772 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051000
3. Jacquin, L., Molton, P., Deck, S., Maury, B., Soulevant, D.: Experimental study of shock oscillation over a transonic supercritical profile. AIAA J. 47(9), 1985–1994 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30190
4. Iovnovich, M., Raveh, D.E.: Reynolds-averaged Navier-stokes study of the shock-buffet instability mechanism. AIAA J. 50(4), 880–890 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051329
5. Crouch, J., Garbaruk, A., Magidov, D., Travin, A.: Origin and structure of transonic buffet on airfoils. In: 5th AIAA Theoretical Fluid Mechanics Conference (2008). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-4233