Model-based safety assessment for conceptual aircraft systems design

Author:

Gradel SimonORCID,Aigner Benedikt,Stumpf Eike

Abstract

AbstractTraditional system technology modeling in conceptual aircraft design mainly relies on empirical knowledge and methods derived from conventional systems, for which valid system architecture designs are known. Since these systems have been proven valid especially from a safety perspective, detailed system safety analyses are usually not necessary. For unconventional systems and innovative technologies, on contrary, new architectures have to be designed and system safety has, therefore, to be taken into account. Therefore, the application of model-based safety assessment (MBSA) for designing system architectures in conceptual aircraft design studies is proposed. A MBSA approach based on a Simulink architecture model is presented which is tailored for use in conceptual design studies. It is applied to the cryocooling system of a hybrid-electric powertrain architecture from an already-published study. The original architecture as well as possible architecture alternatives are investigated. As a result, a safer architecture version with lower number of components can be proposed. The application example indicates that using MBSA in conceptual design benefits the latter by providing insights into safety properties of the system and by pointing out architecture safety weaknesses. This could result in safer, thus more realistic system architectures.

Funder

RWTH Aachen University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Aerospace Engineering,Transportation

Reference28 articles.

1. European Commission: Flightpath 2050. Europe’s Vision for Aviation—Maintaining Global Leadership & Serving Society’s Needs. Report of the High-Level Group on Aviation Research. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2011). https://doi.org/10.2777/50266 

2. Advisory Council for Aviation and Innovation in Europe: Strategic Research & Innovation Agenda. vol. 1. (2017). https://www.acare4europe.org/sites/acare4europe.org/files/document/ACARE-Strategic-Research-Innovation-Volume-1.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2021.

3. Vesely, W.E., Goldberg, F.F, Roberts, N.H., Haasl, D.F.: Fault Tree Handbook. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington D.C. (1981)

4. Society of Automotive Engineers: ARP4761. Guidelines and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipment. SAE International, Warrendale (PA) (1996). https://doi.org/10.4271/ARP4761

5. Lisagor, O: Failure logic modeling. A pragmatic approach. Ph.D. thesis (2010)

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3