Abstract
AbstractTraditional system technology modeling in conceptual aircraft design mainly relies on empirical knowledge and methods derived from conventional systems, for which valid system architecture designs are known. Since these systems have been proven valid especially from a safety perspective, detailed system safety analyses are usually not necessary. For unconventional systems and innovative technologies, on contrary, new architectures have to be designed and system safety has, therefore, to be taken into account. Therefore, the application of model-based safety assessment (MBSA) for designing system architectures in conceptual aircraft design studies is proposed. A MBSA approach based on a Simulink architecture model is presented which is tailored for use in conceptual design studies. It is applied to the cryocooling system of a hybrid-electric powertrain architecture from an already-published study. The original architecture as well as possible architecture alternatives are investigated. As a result, a safer architecture version with lower number of components can be proposed. The application example indicates that using MBSA in conceptual design benefits the latter by providing insights into safety properties of the system and by pointing out architecture safety weaknesses. This could result in safer, thus more realistic system architectures.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Aerospace Engineering,Transportation
Reference28 articles.
1. European Commission: Flightpath 2050. Europe’s Vision for Aviation—Maintaining Global Leadership & Serving Society’s Needs. Report of the High-Level Group on Aviation Research. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2011). https://doi.org/10.2777/50266
2. Advisory Council for Aviation and Innovation in Europe: Strategic Research & Innovation Agenda. vol. 1. (2017). https://www.acare4europe.org/sites/acare4europe.org/files/document/ACARE-Strategic-Research-Innovation-Volume-1.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2021.
3. Vesely, W.E., Goldberg, F.F, Roberts, N.H., Haasl, D.F.: Fault Tree Handbook. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington D.C. (1981)
4. Society of Automotive Engineers: ARP4761. Guidelines and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipment. SAE International, Warrendale (PA) (1996). https://doi.org/10.4271/ARP4761
5. Lisagor, O: Failure logic modeling. A pragmatic approach. Ph.D. thesis (2010)
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献