Abstract
AbstractThis paper demonstrates the importance of assessing the whirl flutter stability of propeller configurations with a detailed aeroelastic model instead of local pylon models. Especially with the growing use of electric motors for propulsion in air taxis and commuter aircraft whirl flutter becomes an important mode of instability. These configurations often include propeller which are powered by lightweight electric motors and located at remote locations, e.g. the wing tip. This gives rise to an aeroelastic instability called whirl flutter, involving the gyroscopic whirl modes of the engine. The driving parameters for this instability are the dynamics of the mounting structure. Using a generic whirl flutter model of a propeller at the tip of a lifting surface, parameter studies on the flutter stability are carried out. The aeroelastic model consists of a dynamic MSC.Nastran beam model coupled with the unsteady ZAERO ZONA6 aerodynamic model and strip theory for the propeller aerodynamics. The parameter studies focus on the influence of different substructures (ranging from local engine mount stiffness to global aircraft dynamics) on the aeroelastic stability of the propeller. The results show a strong influence of the level of detail of the aeroelastic model on the flutter behaviour. The coupling with the lifting surface is of major importance, as it can stabilise the whirl flutter mode. Including wing unsteady aerodynamics into the analysis can also change the whirl flutter behaviour. This stresses the importance of including whirl flutter in the aeroelastic stability analysis on aircraft level.
Funder
Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft, Landesentwicklung und Energie
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Aerospace Engineering,Transportation
Reference23 articles.
1. Cecrdle, J.: Application of whirl flutter optimization-based solution to full-span model of twin turboprop aircraft. In: Proceedings of the VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS Congress 2016), pp. 3293–3309. Institute of Structural Analysis and Antiseismic Research School of Civil Engineering National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) Greece (2016). https://doi.org/10.7712/100016.2035.6754
2. Cecrdle, J.: Whirl flutter-related certification according to FAR/CS 23 and 25 regulation standards. In: International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics 2019, IFASD 2019. International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics (IFASD), Savannah, GA, USA (2019)
3. Cecrdle, J.: Analysis of Twin Turboprop Aircraft Whirl-Flutter Stability Boundaries. J. Aircr. 49(6), 1718–1725 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031390
4. Cecrdle, J.: Whirl Flutter of Turboprop Aircraft Structures. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2015)
5. Certification Specifications and Acceptable Means of Compliance for Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter Category Aeroplanes. Tech. Rep. CS-23 Amd. 4, European Aviation Safety Agency, Cologne, Germany (2015)
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献