Abstract
AbstractWorldwide, marine conflicts are growing in frequency and intensity due to increasing global demands for resources (Blue Growth) and climate change. This article introduces a collection in Maritime Studies on marine conflicts and pathways to sustainability in an era of Blue Growth and climate change. We posit that while conflict can be problematic, it can also play a positive role in bringing about societal change, by highlighting unsustainable and unjust practices and be a trigger for sustainability transformation. However, left unattended, festering marine conflict can hinder just and equitable sustainability transformation. We present two distinct, yet arguably complementary, lenses through which researchers working with sustainability engage with marine conflicts. First, a social-ecological systems approach engages in conflicts by examining the interdependencies between human and ecological systems and related governance arrangements, promoting collaborative learning and action, and exploring adaptive governance strategies that seek sustainability conflict resolution. Second, a political ecology approach addresses conflicts by examining power dynamics and resource (mal)distributions, arguing for fair governance, and emphasizing the need to address historical and current injustices that are at the root of conflicts. Next, we present insights on diverse sustainability transformational pathways, including the importance of searching for common ground and the need for the reconfiguration of power relations as key steps to understand and inform sustainability conflict research. We conclude by indicating that more sustainability research in marine conflict settings is needed and by forwarding intersectionality as a promising approach to productively reframe and disrupt the debilitating effects of deep-rooted marine sustainability conflicts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Water Science and Technology,Development,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference75 articles.
1. Alexander, Karen.A. 2020. Conflicts over marine and coastal common resources: Causes, governance and prevention. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315206424.
2. Arbo, Peter, and Phạm Thị Thanh Thủy. 2016. Use conflicts in marine ecosystem-based management - the case of oil versus fisheries. Ocean and Coastal Management 122: 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.01.008.
3. Arias Schreiber, Milena, and Maris B. Gillette. 2023. Reconceptualizing coastal fisheries conflicts: a Swedish case study. Maritime Studies 22: 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-023-00317-1.
4. Aysan, Ahmet Faruk, Yassine Bakkar, Shajara Ul-Durar, and Umar Nawaz Kayani. 2023. Natural resources governance and conflicts: Retrospective analysis. Resources Policy 85 (A): 103942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103942.
5. Batterbury, Simon. 2018. Affirmative and engaged political ecology: Practical applications and participatory development actions. Nordia Geographical Publications 47 (5): 111–131 https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/79938.