Abstract
AbstractAlgae-based biomass occupies a prominent role in policy narratives for a more sustainable future situated between Blue Growth Strategies and European (Blue) bioeconomy development. Especially in Norway, the developing seaweed farming sector is portrayed as a novel bioresource sector entailing an array of benefits to remediate global as local environmental and socio-economic challenges. Accredited with massive growth potentials and framed by large-scale industrialist rhetoric with a future in conquering ocean spaces through technological fixes, the sector’s development faces multiple challenges. Additionally, the assumptive growth-centred policy narratives employed leave little room for small-scale, locally embedded alternatives called upon by many experts on sustainable and socially just blue resource governance. The paper addresses this issue by conceptualizing Norwegian seaweed farming as an assembling process with a focus on (policy) narratives as a means for governmental spatial interventions. Based on qualitative data with a focus on active Norwegian seaweed farmers’ perspectives for the sector’s current practices and future developments, the paper assesses the relations and contradictions between the optimistic key policy narratives, current sector developments, and the entrepreneur positionalities that shape the reproduction processes of this Norwegian seaweed assemblage. The paper shows that strong beliefs in extensive growth and technological solutions to tackle the fluid materialities of seaweed production are widespread among entrepreneurs. Paired with policy strategies and a development environment rooted in similar narratives, this creates a current development approach that reduces challenges to technological and administrative domains and neglects the (local) socio-economic and sustainability potential vested in alternative, small-scale approaches.
Funder
University of Eastern Finland (UEF) including Kuopio University Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Water Science and Technology,Development,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference71 articles.
1. Aftenposten 2020. Taredyrking er i ferd med å bli stor industri. Er vi forberedt? (24.11.2020). https://www.aftenposten.no/viten/i/7K7yPB/taredyrking-er-i-ferd-med-aa-bli-stor-industri-er-vi-forberedt. Accessed 12 December 2020.
2. Albrecht, M. (forthcoming). A billion-euro industry? (De-)terrtitorialisation processes of Norway’s seaweed farming assemblage. In review.
3. Albrecht, M. 2019. (Re-)producing bioassemblages: positionalities of regional bioeconomy development in Finland. Local Environment 24 (4): 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2019.1567482.
4. Albrecht, M., and J. Lukkarinen. 2020. Blue bioeconomy localities at the margins: reconnecting Norwegian seaweed farming and Finnish small-scale lake fisheries with blue policies. Environment and Planning C 38 (7-8): 1465–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420932572.
5. Albrecht, M., J. Kortelainen, M. Sawatzky, J. Lukkarinen, and T. Rytteri. 2017. Translating bioenergy policy in Europe: Mutation, aims and boosterism in EU energy governance. Geoforum 87: 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.003.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献