Abstract
AbstractNational assessments produced regularly from 1996/97 to 2019/20 provide standard estimates of the evolution of poverty in Mozambique. Stylised facts point to significant reduction in monetary and multidimensional poverty until 2014/15, even though characterised by persistent urban–rural and regional inequalities in several dimensions, followed by worsening deprivation during 2014/15–2019/20. In this paper, we rely on first-order dominance (FOD) methodology to check the robustness of standard poverty estimates while providing deeper insights into what happened in this poverty-stricken country. Our main findings include that the capital city, Maputo, and surrounding areas progressively came to dominate all other provinces in terms of well-being, and the provincial rankings from spatial FOD analysis are very stable over time. Rural areas, mainly those in the northern and central regions, are, with a few exceptions, always at the bottom of the ranking. Moreover, our FOD temporal analysis reveals that 2019/20 dominates, with a high degree of confidence, the results from earlier years, pointing to positive development over time, but with one important exception. The comparison between 2019/20 and 2014/15 is indeterminate, indicating that no significant advancement took place during this period. What stands out is the compelling need for concerted policy action to address the strong and persistent spatial gaps in welfare and poverty, including the capacity to respond effectively to external and internal shocks.
Funder
This study was prepared under the Data & Evidence to End Extreme Poverty (DEEP) project funded with UK aid from the UK government and managed by Oxford Policy Management (OPM).
Copenhagen University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Alkire S (2016) The capability approach and well-being measurement for public policy. In: Adler MD, Fleurbaey M (eds) The oxford handbook of well-being and public policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
2. Alkire S, Foster JE (2011) Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. J Public Econ 95(7):476–487
3. Alkire S, Foster J, Seth S, Santos M, Roche J, Ballon P (2015a) Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford
4. Alkire S, Foster J, Seth S, Santos M, Roche J, Ballon P (2015b). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis: Chapter 3—Overview of methods for multidimensional poverty assessment. In: Alkire S, Foster JE, Seth S, Santos ME, Roche JM, Ballon P (Eds) Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis, chapter 3. OPHI Working Paper No. 84. Oxford University Press. Retrieved at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2564782
5. Arndt C, Tarp F (eds) (2017) Measuring poverty and wellbeing in developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford