Resident dictation of operative notes: a reimbursement comparison and mixed-methods analysis

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Surgical documentation is crucial to ensure quality patient care and accurate coding and billing. Operative dictation also serves as a valuable educational opportunity for surgical trainees. However, resident dictations may not fully capture procedural details and complexities, resulting in missed revenue opportunities. On July 1, 2021, our university-based surgery department implemented a policy requiring attendings to dictate all operative reports. The purpose of this mixed-method study was to investigate the financial impact of this policy and explore differences in resident and attending dictations. Methods Core general surgery operations performed by the Department of Surgery between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2022 were identified from billing data. The surgeon, current procedural terminology (CPT) and modifier codes, and relative value units (RVUs) for each case were acquired. Surgeons not present for the entire study period or cases requiring multiple surgeons were excluded. Descriptive statistics and Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) non-parametric tests compared pre- and post-policy RVU distributions on overall charges and 18 key general surgery operations. Targeted thematic analysis was performed on operative reports pre- and post-policy to explore resident and attending differences. Results A total of 42 attendings performed 16,233 cases, billing 28,560 CPT codes (50.3% pre- vs. 49.7% post-policy). There was a small but statistically significant increase in RVU distribution post-policy, mean 20.2 pre- vs. 20.3 RVUs post-, $4372 pre- vs. $4418 per case post-, KS = 0.02 (p = 0.009). Specifically, higher RVU distributions were seen among attending-dictated cases for melanoma (p = 0.009), minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (VHR, p = 0.008), parathyroidectomy (p < 0.001), anorectal incision and drainage (p = 0.003) and anorectal exam under anesthesia (p = 0.029). Higher RVU distributions were noted among resident-dictated, attending-edited cases for partial colectomy (p = 0.043), and open VHR (p = 0.004). No differences were noted among the remaining operations (p > 0.05). Three major themes were noted from focused sampling of 112 operative reports: billable items, clinical/surgical reasoning, and technical details. Differences in billable items and clinical and surgical reasoning were the most influential on modifying clinical implications of operative notes. Themes and differences were consistent regardless of surgeon or specialty. Conclusion Adopting an attending-only operative dictation policy yielded a small increase in billable RVUs, predominantly from select operations. Gaps in coding-directed language and depth of clinical reasoning were noted in resident dictations. These findings reveal an educational opportunity that concomitantly optimizes patient care, resident education, and procedural revenue.