“At a Glance:” The Role of Diagrammatic Representations in Eugenics Appropriations of the “Infamous Juke Family”

Author:

Ceccon Andrea

Abstract

AbstractThe case of the Juke family is one of the most notable episodes of the history of eugenics in the USA. The Jukes were initially brought to the fore in the 1870s by a famous investigation that aimed at estimating the interplay of heredity and environment in determining the problems of poverty and crime. This inquiry triggered a harsh confrontation between two polar interpretations of the study, an “environmentalist” one and a “hereditarian” one. It was with the later reassessment of the case made by the Eugenics American Office (ERO) in the 1910s that the controversy was considered closed with the victory of the eugenicists’ hereditarian stance. As a result, the family was made a living proof of the alleged hereditary nature of crime and pauperism and a case study in support of the eugenicists’ plea for the sterilization of people deemed the bearers of hereditary defectiveness. In this article, I explore the role played by pedigrees and other diagrammatic representations in the eugenicists’ appropriation of the meaning of the case of the Juke family and the role played by this appropriation in asserting the superiority of the ERO’s method of work over rival approaches.

Funder

Swiss National Foundation

Universität zu Lübeck

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference78 articles.

1. Adams, John. 1910. Exposition and illustration in teaching. New York: Macmillan.

2. Allen, Garland E. 1986. The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor, 1910–1940: An essay in institutional history. Osiris 2: 225–264.

3. Anonymous. 1874a. A mother of criminals. The New York Times, December 19, p. 6.

4. Anonymous. 1874b. Crime and its growth. The New York Times, December 20, p. 7.

5. Anonymous. 1875a. Report of the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Education, November 1874. In Executive documents printed by order of the House of Representatives. 1874–‘75, 43rd Congress, second session, Vol. vii, cxix–cxx. Washington: Government Printing Office.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3