Recursive Monotonicity of the Scorix: Borda Meets Condorcet-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Recursive Monotonicity of the Scorix: Borda Meets Condorcet

Published:2017-01-24 Issue:4 Volume:26 Page:793-813
ISSN:0926-2644
Container-title:Group Decision and Negotiation
language:en
Short-container-title:Group Decis Negot

Author:

Pérez-Fernández Raúl^ORCID,De Baets Bernard

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Social Sciences,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),General Decision Sciences

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10726-017-9525-y/fulltext.html

Reference42 articles.

1. Baharad E, Nitzan S (2005) The inverse plurality rule—an axiomatization. Social Choice Welf 25:173–178

2. Bartholdi J, Tovey CA, Trick A (1989) Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election. Social Choice Welf 6:157–165

3. Borda JC (1781) Mémoire sur les Élections au Scrutin. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, Paris

4. Chebotarev PY, Shamis E (1998) Characterizations of scoring methods for preference aggregation. Ann Oper Res 80:299–332

5. Condorcet M (1785) Essai sur l’Application de l’Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix. De l’Imprimerie Royale, Paris

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Transitivity measurements of fuzzy preference relations;Fuzzy Sets and Systems;2021-10

2. Combinatorics of Election Scores;Studies in Choice and Welfare;2020-12-19

3. The acclamation consensus state and an associated ranking rule;International Journal of Intelligent Systems;2019-01-29

4. The superdominance relation, the positional winner, and more missing links between Borda and Condorcet;Journal of Theoretical Politics;2018-11-29