Author:
Fleming Thomas R.,Garnett Christine E.,Conklin Laurie S.,Corriol-Rohou Solange,Hariharan Sudharshan,Hsu Daphne,Mueller-Velten Guenther,Mulugeta Yeruk,Portman Ronald,Rothmann Mark D.,Stockbridge Norman L.,Wandel Simon,Zhang Jialu,Yao Lynne
Abstract
AbstractEven with recent substantive improvements in health care in pediatric populations, considerable need remains for additional safe and effective interventions for the prevention and treatment of diseases in children. The approval of prescription drugs and biological products for use in pediatric settings, as in adults, requires demonstration of substantial evidence of effectiveness and favorable benefit-to-risk. For diseases primarily affecting children, such evidence predominantly would be obtained in the pediatric setting. However, for conditions affecting both adults and children, pediatric extrapolation uses scientific evidence in adults to enable more efficiently obtaining a reliable evaluation of an intervention’s effects in pediatric populations. Bridging biomarkers potentially have an integral role in pediatric extrapolation. In a setting where an intervention reliably has been established to be safe and effective in adults, and where there is substantive evidence that disease processes in pediatric and adult settings are biologically similar, a ‘bridging biomarker’ should satisfy three additional criteria: effects on the bridging biomarker should capture effects on the principal causal pathway through which the disease process meaningfully influences ‘feels, functions, survives’ measures; secondly, the experimental intervention should not have important unintended effects on ‘feels, functions, survives’ measures not captured by the bridging biomarker; and thirdly, in statistical analyses in adults, the intervention’s net effect on ‘feels, functions, survives’ measures should be consistent with what would be predicted by its level of effect on the bridging biomarker. A validated bridging biomarker has considerable potential utility, since an intervention’s efficacy could be extrapolated from adult to pediatric populations if evidence in children establishes the intervention not only to be safe but also to have substantive effects on that bridging biomarker. Proper use of bridging biomarkers could increase availability of reliably evaluated therapies approved for use in pediatric settings, enabling children and their caregivers to make informed choices about health care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
Reference49 articles.
1. Sachs AN, Avant D, Lee CS, Rodriguez W, Murphy MD. Pediatric information in drug product labeling. JAMA. 2012;307(18):1914–5.
2. Best Pharmaceuticals for Child Act of 2002; Pub L. No 107-109, 115 STAT. 1408, January 4, 2002.
3. Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, Pub L No. 108-155, 117 STAT. 1936, December 3, 2003.
4. U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration. Draft Guidance for Industry: Benefit Risk Assessment for New Drugs and Biological Products. 2021. https://www.fda.gov/media/152544/download.
5. U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration. Guidance for Industry: E11(R1) Addendum: Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Pediatric Population. 2018. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/e11r1-addendum-clinical-investigation-medicinal-products-pediatric-population.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献