A Method to Redesign and Simplify Schedules of Assessment and Quantify the Impacts. Applications to Merck Protocols

Author:

Cummings Steven R.,Chetham Scott,Lee Andy

Abstract

AbstractThe growing complexity of biopharmaceutical sponsored trials has adverse impacts on increased burdens on participants, clinical sites, and sponsors, including greater difficulty recruiting and retaining participants, difficulty engaging sites to participate in trials, excessive cost of trials, and increased cycle times. The schedule of assessments (SoAs) is the origin of and blueprint for complexity that is often generated by copying and pasting from previous SoAs. We developed an approach, termed Lean Design, for redesigning the assessments in SoAs that generate data, the ‘Data SoA.’ It starts with a simple “ground zero” SoA. Any addition is challenged using several principles of trial design. We employed a system, the Faro Trial Designer Tool, to quantify the impacts of changes in an SoA to provide real-time feedback to the team and sponsor. We applied the approach in workshops with teams for six clinical trials in various stages of design and implementation. The approach resulted in recommendation for substantial potential savings in participant and site staff time, costs, and complexity of the trials. Application of this approach to very early stages of protocol design has the potential to reduce the complexity of biopharmaceutical sponsored trials and its consequences.

Funder

Merck

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference9 articles.

1. EMA. ICH guideline E19 on. a selective approach to safety data collection in specific late-stage pre-approval or post-approval clinical trials - Scientific guideline [Internet]. European Medicines Agency. 2019 [cited 2023 Nov 27]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-guideline-e19-selective-approach-safety-data-collection-specific-late-stage-pre-approval-post.

2. Getz KA, Campo RA. Trial watch: Trends in clinical trial design complexity. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:307.

3. Martin L, Hutchens M, Hawkins C, Radnov A. How much do clinical trials cost? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:381–2.

4. Ledesma P. How Much Does a Clinical Trial Cost? [Internet]. Sofpromed. 2020 [cited 2023 Nov 12]. https://www.sofpromed.com/how-much-does-a-clinical-trial-cost.

5. Moore TJ, Heyward J, Anderson G, Alexander GC. Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015–2017: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e038863.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3