Abstract
AbstractSince their introduction by the Conservative government in 2013, primary school children in England have taken a mandated grammar, punctuation and spelling assessment, which places an emphasis on decontextualised, standardised English and the identification of traditional grammatical terminology. Despite some concise criticisms from educational linguists, there remains no detailed and critical investigation into the nature of the tests, their effects on test takers, and the policy initiatives which led up to their implementation. This article contributes to this gap in knowledge, using critical language testing as a methodological framework, and drawing on a bricolage of data sources such as political speeches, policy documents, test questions and interviews with teachers. I discuss how the tests work as de facto language policy, implemented as one arm of the government’s ‘core-knowledge’ educational agenda, underpinned by a reductive conceptualisation of language and a problematic discourse of ‘right/wrong’ ways of speaking. I reveal how teachers talk about the ‘power’ of the tests, intimidating and coercing them into pedagogies they do not necessarily believe in or value, which ultimately position them as vehicles for the government’s conservative and prescriptive language ideologies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,Language and Linguistics
Reference77 articles.
1. Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardisation of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.
2. Ball, S. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse, 13, 10–17.
3. Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Perryman, J., & Hoskins, K. (2012). Assessment technologies in schools: ‘Deliverology’ and the ‘play of dominations.’ Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 513–533.
4. Barakos, E., & Unger, J. (Eds.). (2016). Discursive approaches to language policy. London: Palgrave.
5. Barrs, M. (2019). Teaching bad writing. English in Education, 53(1), 18–31.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献