Author:
Valenta Ines,Schindler Thomas Hellmut
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference10 articles.
1. Flotats A, Bravo PE, Fukushima K, Chaudry M, Merrill J, Bengel FM. 82Rb-PET myocardial perfusion imaging is superior to 99mTc-labelled agent SPECT in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2140-x .
2. Schindler TH, Schelbert HR, Quercioli A, Dilsizian V. Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3(6):623–40.
3. Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, Saha GB, Neumann DR, Underwood DA, et al. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 1990;31(12):1899–905.
4. Stewart RE, Schwaiger M, Molina E, Popma J, Gacioch GM, Kalus M, et al. Comparison of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1991;67(16):1303–10.
5. Garcia EV, Faber TL. Advances in nuclear cardiology instrumentation: clinical potential of SPECT and PET. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 2009;2:230–7.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献