Prognostic value of fibroblast activation protein expressing tumor volume calculated from [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Prognostic value of fibroblast activation protein expressing tumor volume calculated from [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Published:2022-10-12 Issue:2 Volume:50 Page:593-601
ISSN:1619-7070
Container-title:European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

Author:

Zhao Liang,Pang Yizhen,Chen Shanyu,Chen Jianhao,Li Yimin,Yu Yifeng,Huang Chunbin,Sun Long,Wu Hua,Chen Haojun^ORCID,Lin Qin

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province

Key Medical and Health Projects in Xiamen

Key Scientific Research Program for Yong Scholars in Fujian

Fujian Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Yong Scholars Province

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00259-022-05989-1.pdf

Reference39 articles.

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

2. Abnet CC, Arnold M, Wei WQ. Epidemiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(2):360–73. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.08.023.

3. Collaborators GBDOC. The global, regional, and national burden of oesophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(6):582–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30007-8.

4. van Workum F, Verstegen MHP, Klarenbeek BR, Bouwense SAW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Daams F, et al. Intrathoracic vs cervical anastomosis after totally or hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(7):601–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1555.

5. Sudo K, Xiao L, Wadhwa R, Shiozaki H, Elimova E, Taketa T, et al. Importance of surveillance and success of salvage strategies after definitive chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(30):3400–5. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7156.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Role of molecular imaging in prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment of gastrointestinal cancers: An update on new therapeutic methods;World Journal of Methodology;2024-12-20

2. 68Ga-FAPI Response Evaluation Pitfall in a Patient With Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy;Clinical Nuclear Medicine;2024-09-12

3. Integrated 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR in Pancreatic Cancer;Clinical Nuclear Medicine;2024-06-21

4. Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor Tracers and Their Preclinical, Translational, and Clinical Status in China;Journal of Nuclear Medicine;2024-05

5. PET/TC con FAPI: procedimiento y revisión de la evidencia en oncología;Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular;2024-03