The prognostic significance of a negative PSMA-PET scan prior to salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy
-
Published:2023-09-22
Issue:2
Volume:51
Page:558-567
-
ISSN:1619-7070
-
Container-title:European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Author:
Adebahr Sonja, Althaus Alexander, Scharl Sophia, Strouthos Iosif, Farolfi Andrea, Serani Francesca, Lanzafame Helena, Trapp Christian, Koerber Stefan A., Peeken Jan C., Vogel Marco M. E., Vrachimis Alexis, Spohn Simon K. B., Grosu Anca-Ligia, Kroeze Stephanie G. C., Guckenberger Matthias, Fanti Stefano, Hruby George, Emmett Louise, Belka Claus, Schmidt-Hegemann Nina-Sophie, Henkenberens Christoph, Aebersold Daniel M., Wiegel Thomas, Afshar-Oromieh Ali, Zamboglou Constantinos, Shelan MohamedORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
The optimal management for early recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with negative prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography (PSMA-PET) scan is an ongoing subject of debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with biochemical recurrence with negative PSMA PET finding.
Methods
This retrospective, multicenter (11 centers, 5 countries) analysis included patients who underwent SRT following biochemical recurrence (BR) of PC after RP without evidence of disease on PSMA-PET staging. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), metastatic-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression assessed predefined predictors of survival outcomes.
Results
Three hundred patients were included, 253 (84.3%) received SRT to the prostate bed only, 46 (15.3%) additional elective pelvic nodal irradiation, respectively. Only 41 patients (13.7%) received concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Median follow-up after SRT was 33 months (IQR: 20–46 months). Three-year bRFS, MFS, and OS following SRT were 73.9%, 87.8%, and 99.1%, respectively. Three-year bRFS was 77.5% and 48.3% for patients with PSA levels before PSMA-PET ≤ 0.5 ng/ml and > 0.5 ng/ml, respectively. Using univariate analysis, the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade > 2 (p = 0.006), metastatic pelvic lymph nodes at surgery (p = 0.032), seminal vesicle involvement (p < 0.001), pre-SRT PSA level of > 0.5 ng/ml (p = 0.004), and lack of concomitant ADT (p = 0.023) were significantly associated with worse bRFS. On multivariate Cox proportional hazards, seminal vesicle infiltration (p = 0.007), ISUP score >2 (p = 0.048), and pre SRT PSA level > 0.5 ng/ml (p = 0.013) remained significantly associated with worse bRFS.
Conclusion
Favorable bRFS after SRT in patients with BR and negative PSMA-PET following RP was achieved. These data support the usage of early SRT for patients with negative PSMA-PET findings.
Funder
University of Bern
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine
Reference40 articles.
1. Bottke D, Bartkowiak D, Siegmann A, Thamm R, Böhmer D, Budach V, Wiegel T. Effect of early salvage radiotherapy at PSA < 0.5 ng/ml and impact of post-SRT PSA nadir in post-prostatectomy recurrent prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019;22(2):344–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-018-0112-3. 2. Tendulkar RD, Agrawal S, Gao T, Efstathiou JA, Pisansky TM, Michalski JM, Koontz BF, Hamstra DA, Feng FY, Liauw SL, Abramowitz MC, Pollack A, Anscher MS, Moghanaki D, Den RB, Stephans KL, Zietman AL, Lee WR, Kattan MW, Stephenson AJ. Contemporary update of a multi-institutional predictive nomogram for salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(30):3648–54. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.9647. 3. Tilki D, Chen MH, Wu J, Huland H, Graefen M, Wiegel T, Böhmer D, Mohamad O, Cowan JE, Feng FY, Carroll PR, Trock BJ, Partin AW, D'Amico AV. Adjuvant versus early salvage radiation therapy for men at high risk for recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and the risk of death. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(20):2284–93. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.03714. 4. Sargos P, Chabaud S, Latorzeff I, Magné N, Benyoucef A, Supiot S, Pasquier D, Abdiche MS, Gilliot O, Graff-Cailleaud P, Silva M, Bergerot P, Baumann P, Belkacemi Y, Azria D, Brihoum M, Soulié M, Richaud P. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy plus short-term androgen deprivation therapy in men with localised prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 17): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(10):1341–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30454-X. 5. Vale CL, Fisher D, Kneebone A, Parker C, Pearse M, Richaud P, Sargos P, Sydes MR, Brawley C, Brihoum M, Brown C, Chabaud S, Cook A, Forcat S, Fraser-Browne C, Latorzeff I, MKB P, Tierney JF, ARTISTIC Meta-analysis Group. Adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data. Lancet. 2020;396(10260):1422–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31952-8.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|