A Study Examining the Usefulness of a New Measure of Research Engagement

Author:

Bowen Deborah J.,Ackermann Nicole,Thompson Vetta Saunders,Nederveld Andrea,Goodman Melody

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Engagement of relevant stakeholders’ ideas, opinions, and concerns is critical to the success of modern research projects. We have developed a tool to measure stakeholder engagement, called the Research Engagement Survey Tool (REST). The purpose of this paper is to present the implementation and uptake of the stakeholder engagement measure REST among research teams, including the assessment of barriers and facilitating factors for use of the new research engagement measure in practice. Methods In this implementation study, project team members participated in baseline and follow-up web-based surveys. Web-based interviews were conducted with a subset of project teams that implemented the REST. On the baseline survey, project teams were asked to provide details about up to three ongoing or recently completed projects, were asked if they agreed with compensation for REST completion, and were asked if they would like to send the survey to stakeholders or would prefer our project team to email their project stakeholders. Follow-up surveys contained questions on reactions to implementing REST and results of REST. Results Project team members/researchers who completed the baseline survey (n=86) were mostly female (79%) and Non-Hispanic/Latino(a) White (76%). Those who implemented REST were also mostly female (86%) and Non-Hispanic/Latino(a) White (71%), with an average of 11 years in academic research. About 98% of all participants completing the baseline survey had the capacity to survey partners, while 100% of all teams who implemented REST did. A small portion of respondents indicated the time commitment of REST would be a barrier (29% of baseline survey respondents, 10% of those who implemented REST) and indicated workload would be a barrier (31% of baseline survey respondents, 14% of those who implemented REST). Discussion The data presented here indicate that REST implementation is feasible in a volunteer group of ongoing research projects.

Funder

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Internal Medicine

Reference12 articles.

1. Goodman MS, Sanders Thompson VL. The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(3):486-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0495-z

2. Goodman MS, Ackermann N, Bowen DJ, Thompson V. Content validation of a quantitative stakeholder engagement measure. J Community Psychol. 2019;47(8):1937-1951. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22239

3. Goodman MS, Ackermann N, Bowen DJ, Panel D, Thompson VS. Reaching Consensus on Principles of Stakeholder Engagement in Research. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):117-127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2020.0014

4. McCloskey DJ, McDonald MA, Cook J, et al. Community Engagement : Definitions and Organizing Concepts from the Literature. In: Principles of Community Engagement. 2nd ed. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012:41.

5. Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement. Principles of Community Engagement. NIH Publication No. 11-7782; 2011. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/. Accessed 23 Jun 2021

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3