Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Maintaining Internal Systems and Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018 was created in response to reports of prolonged wait times for veterans accessing health care within the Veterans Affairs (VA) system. In Michigan, the MISSION Act Community Care Program led to an increased number of veterans receiving specialty care outside the VA system, in part due to the complicated process of coordinating specialty care within the VA system. From 2018 to 2020, the percentage of veterans referred to the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (AA) for specialty care from its two referring facilities, Battle Creek VA Medical Center (BC) and Saginaw VA Healthcare System (SAG), decreased from 54.4 to 27%.
Objective
Improve the number of Michigan veterans choosing VA specialty care.
Intervention
In 2021, three VA facilities in Michigan (AA, BC, and SAG) created a market-level referral system named the Michigan Market Referral Initiative (MMRCI). This unique approach used a centralized nurse-driven team to manage specialty referrals, working directly with the veteran to explore both VA and community care (CC) options.
Main Measures
Referrals triaged and acceptance rates for VA care were tracked. The localized Standard Episode of Care model was used to estimate cost savings. Post-intervention AA patient wait times were compared to local CC wait times.
Key Results
In the 14 months after implementation of the MMRCI, the rate of veteran retention increased by 32.4%. The estimated dollars retained within the VA by MMRCI efforts was $24,105,251 as of 7/1/2022. Post-intervention AA wait times were superior to community care except in 3 specialties.
Conclusions
This multifacility effort is an example of a highly coordinated, veteran-centered collaboration that has led to successful retention of veterans within the VA system with resultant large-scale cost avoidance and comparable clinic wait times. Focusing on central care coordination and veteran engagement in the referral process are keys to its success, along with leveraging existing referral patterns between nearby VA facilities. This model could be extrapolated to other VA markets throughout the country where similar relationships exist.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. VA Office of Inspector General. Veterans Health Administration review of alleged patient deaths, patient wait times, and scheduling practices at the Phoenix VA Health Care System; 2014. https://www.va.gov/oig/pubs/vaoig-14-02603-267.pdf.
2. Mattocks KM, Yano EM, Brown A, Casares J, Bastian L. Examining women veteran’s experiences, perceptions, and challenges with the veterans choice program. Med Care. 2018;56(7):557-560. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000933.
3. Ayele RA, Lawrence E, McCreight M, et al. Perspectives of clinicians, staff, and veterans in transitioning veterans from Non-VA hospitals to primary care in a single VA healthcare system. J Hosp Med. 2020;15(3):133-139. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3320.
4. Mattocks KM, Kroll-Desrosiers A, Kinney R, Elwy AR, Cunningham KJ, Mengeling MA. Understanding VA’s use of and relationships with community care providers under the MISSION Act. Med Care. 2021;59(6 Suppl 3):S252-S258. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001545.
5. The Veterans Community Care Program: Background and Early Effects. www.cbo.gov/system/files/2021-10/57257-VCCP.pdf.