Author:
Wilson Sarah M.,Mulcahy Abigail C.,Lange Tiffany M.,Eldridge Madeleine R.,Weidenbacher Hollis J.,Jackson George L.,Gierisch Jennifer M.,Crowley Matthew J.,Calhoun Patrick S.,Hilgeman Michelle M.
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Objective
The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) PRIDE in All Who Served health education group (PRIDE) was developed to improve health equity and access to care for military veterans who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and/or other sexual/gender-diverse identities (LGBTQ+). This 10-week program rapidly spread to over 30 VHA facilities in 4 years. Veterans receiving PRIDE experience improved LGBTQ+ identity-related resilience and reductions in suicide attempt likelihood. Despite PRIDE’s rapid spread across facilities, information is lacking on implementation determinants. The current study’s goal was to clarify determinants of PRIDE group implementation and sustainment.
Methods
A purposive sample of VHA staff (N = 19) with experience delivering or implementing PRIDE completed teleconference interviews January–April 2021. The interview guide was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Rapid qualitative matrix analysis was completed with methods to ensure rigor (e.g., triangulation and investigator reflexivity).
Results
Key barriers and facilitators of PRIDE implementation were heavily related to facility inner setting (what is happening inside the facility), including implementation readiness (e.g., leadership support for LGBTQ+-affirming programming, access to LGBTQ+-affirming care training) and facility culture (e.g., systemic anti-LGBTQ+ stigma). Several implementation process facilitators enhanced engagement at sites, such as a centrally facilitated PRIDE learning collaborative and a formal process of contracting/training for new PRIDE sites.
Discussion/Conclusion
Although aspects of the outer setting and larger societal influences were mentioned, the majority of factors impacting implementation success were at the VHA facility level and therefore may be more readily addressable through tailored implementation support. The importance of LGBTQ+ equity at the facility level indicates that implementation facilitation should ideally address institutional equity in addition to implementation logistics. Combining effective interventions with attention to local implementation needs will be required before LGBTQ+ veterans in all areas will benefit from PRIDE and other health equity-focused interventions.
Funder
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Livingston NA, Berke DS, Ruben MA, Matza AR, Shipherd JC. Experiences of trauma, discrimination, microaggressions, and minority stress among trauma-exposed LGBT veterans: unexpected findings and unresolved service gaps. Psychol Trauma Theory Res Pract Policy. 2019;11(7):695.
2. Kauth MR, Blosnich JR, Marra J, Keig Z, Shipherd JC. Transgender health care in the U.S. Military and Veterans Health Administration facilities. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2017;9(3):121–7.
3. Carey FR, LeardMann CA, Lehavot K, Jacobson IG, Kolaja CA, Stander VA, et al. Health disparities among lesbian, gay, and bisexual service members and veterans. Am J Prev Med [Internet]. 2022 Jul 3 [cited 2022 Sep 16]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074937972200304X
4. Mark KM, McNamara KA, Gribble R, Rhead R, Sharp ML, Stevelink SAM, et al. The health and well-being of LGBTQ serving and ex-serving personnel: a narrative review. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 2;31(1):75–94.
5. Tucker RP. Suicide in transgender veterans: prevalence, prevention, and implications of current policy. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019;14(3):452–68.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献