Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Veterans Health Administration (VA) refers patients to community providers for specialty services not available on-site. However, community-level specialist shortages may impede access to care.
Objective
Compare gynecologist supply in veterans’ county of residence versus at their VA site.
Design
We identified women veteran VA patients from fiscal year (FY) 2017 administrative data and assessed availability of a VA gynecologist within 50 miles (hereafter called “local”) of veterans’ VA homesites (per national VA organizational survey data). For the same cohort, we then assessed community-level gynecologist availability; counties with < 2 gynecologists/10,000 women (per the Area Health Resource File) were “inadequate-supply” counties. We examined the proportion of women veterans with local VA gynecologist availability in counties with inadequate versus adequate gynecologist supply, stratified by individual and VA homesite characteristics. Chi-square tests assessed statistical differences.
Participants
All women veteran FY2017 VA primary care users nationally.
Main Measures
Availability of a VA gynecologist within 50 miles of a veteran’s VA homesite; county-level “inadequate-supply” of gynecologists.
Key Results
Among 407,482 women, 9% were in gynecologist supply deserts (i.e., lacking local VA gynecologist and living in an inadequate-supply county). The sub-populations with the highest proportions in gynecologist supply deserts were rural residents (24%), those who got their primary care at non-VAMC satellite clinics (13%), those who got their care at a site without a women’s clinic (13%), and those with American Indian or Alaska Native (12%), or white (12%) race. Among those in inadequate-supply counties, 59.9% had gynecologists at their local VA; however, 40.1% lacked a local VA gynecologist.
Conclusions
Most veterans living in inadequate-supply counties had local VA gynecology care, reflecting VA’s critical role as a safety net provider. However, for those in gynecologist supply deserts, expanded transportation options, modified staffing models, or tele-gynecology hubs may offer solutions to extend VA gynecology capacity.
Funder
health services research and development
va office of women's health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Doyle JM, Streeter RA. Veterans’ location in health professional shortage areas: implications for access to care and workforce supply. Health Serv Res. 2017;52(Suppl Suppl 1):459-480. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12633
2. Frayne S, Phibbs CS, Saechao F, et al. Sourcebook: Women Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration. Volume 4: Longitudinal Trends in Sociodemographics, Utilization, Health Profile, and Geographic Distribution. Women’s Health Evaluation Initiative, Women’s Health Services, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs,; 2018.
3. Zephyrin LC, Katon JG, Hoggatt K, et al. State of Reproductive Health In Women Veterans– VA Reproductive Health Diagnoses and Organization of Care. Women’s Health Services, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs; 2014. https://www.womenshealth.va.gov/docs/SRH_FINAL.pdf
4. Seelig MD, Yano EM, Bean-Mayberry B, Lanto AB, Washington DL. Availability of gynecologic services in the department of veterans affairs. Womens Health Issues Off Publ Jacobs Inst Womens Health. 2008;18(3):167-173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2007.12.006
5. U. S. Government Accountability Office. VA Health Care: Improved Monitoring Needed for Effective Oversight of Care for Women Veterans. 2016;(GAO-17-52). Accessed November 19, 2020. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-52
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献