Human Rights in Hospitals: an End to Routine Shackling

Author:

Bedi Neil Singh,Mathur Nisha,Wang Judy D.,Rech Avital,Gaden Nancy,Annas George J.,Crosby Sondra S.

Abstract

AbstractMedical students (NSB, NM, JDW) spearheaded revision of the policy and clinical practice for shackling incarcerated patients at Boston Medical Center (BMC), the largest safety net hospital in New England. In American hospitals, routine shackling of incarcerated patients with metal restraints is widespread—except for perinatal patients—regardless of consciousness, mobility, illness severity, or age. The modified policy includes individualized assessments and allows incarcerated patients to be unshackled if they meet defined criteria. The students also formed the Stop Shackling Patients Coalition (SSP Coalition) of clinicians, public health practitioners, human rights advocates, and community members determined to humanize the inpatient treatment of incarcerated patients. Changes pioneered at BMC led the Mass General Brigham health system to follow suit. The Massachusetts Medical Society adopted a resolution authored by the SSP Coalition, which condemned universal shackling and advocated for use of the least restrictive alternative. This will be presented to the American Medical Association in June 2024. The Coalition led a similar effort to coauthor a policy statement on the issue, which was formally adopted by the American Public Health Association in November 2023. Most importantly, in an unprecedented human rights victory, a BMC patient who was incarcerated, sedated, and intubated was unshackled by correctional officers for the purpose of preserving human dignity.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference23 articles.

1. Robinson M, Lavere K, Porsa E. End the Routine Shackling of Incarcerated Inpatients. J Hosp Med. 2021;16(6):376-377. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3581.

2. Lescure T. No Patient Should Have to Die in Shackles. The Washington Post | Opinion. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/10/05/no-patient-should-have-die-shackles/. Published October 5, 2021. Accessed 12 October 2021.

3. Bar N, Naaman E, Rosin D, et al. Shackling incarcerated people in Israeli hospitals—a multicentre study followed by a national intervention programme. Lancet. 2023;402(10398):285-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01242-4.

4. First Step Act of 2018, United States Congress, Public Law 115–391 S.756, 115th Congress.

5. Richardson A. Shackling of pregnant prisoners is ongoing. Bill of Health. https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2020/03/04/shackling-of-pregnant-prisoners-is-ongoing/#:~:text=In%202018%2C%20the%20First%20Step,prevent%20serious%20harm%20or%20escape. Published March 3, 2020. Accessed 23 March 2023.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Medicaid for Medical-Correctional Care: Time to Manage What is Reimbursed;Journal of General Internal Medicine;2024-06-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3