Abstract
AbstractTraditionally, submarine hydrodynamic design has focussed mainly on requirements regarding operational range, powering performance and manoeuvring ability for deeply submerged conditions. To improve the effectiveness of the boat, attention is also paid to operating near or at the surface and fortunately, computational tools and experimental methods are available to analyse the performance of submarines at these conditions. To advance submarine hydrodynamics knowledge and tools, DMO and MARIN have conducted a wide variety of bi-lateral or collaborative studies using potential and viscous flow methods and experiments on several submarine hull forms. In this article, several examples are presented of the development and use of hydrodynamic tools available during the design and assessment process of future submarines. These examples range from experimental and numerical studies into at-surface and periscope-depth resistance and powering, periscope-depth manoeuvring, high-fidelity flow around the boat during straight flight and manoeuvring motions, wakes of surface-piercing masts, to depth keeping under waves. It is demonstrated how state-of-the-art studies help in advancing the knowledge on submarine hydrodynamics and improving the overall design of modern submarines.
Funder
Ministerie van Economische Zaken
Ministerie van Defensie
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ocean Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Water Science and Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference27 articles.
1. Bettle MC, Toxopeus SL, Gerber AG (2010) Calculation of bottom clearance effects on Walrus submarine hydrodynamics. Int Shipbuild Prog 57(3–4):101–125. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISP-2010-0065
2. Carrica PM, Kerkvliet M, Quadvlieg FHHA et al (2016) CFD simulations and experiments of a maneuvering generic submarine and prognosis for simulation of near surface operation. In: 31$${{\rm st}}$$ symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Monterey, CA
3. Devenport WJ, Simpson RL, Dewitz MB et al (1992) Effects of a leading-edge fillet on the flow past an appendage-body junction. AIAA J 30(9):2177–2182. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11201
4. Eisfeld B, Brodersen O (2005) Advanced turbulence modelling and stress analysis for the DLR-F6 configuration. In: 23$${{\rm rd}}$$ AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Toronto, Canada, AIAA2005-4727. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-4727
5. Gertler M (1950) Resistance experiments on a systematic series of streamlined bodies of revolution—for application to the design of high-speed submarines. Tech. Rep. C-297, David W. Taylor Model Basin, Washington, DC
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献