Qualities of consent: an enactive approach to making better sense

Author:

Vassilicos BasilORCID,McGann Marek

Abstract

AbstractPhilosophical work on the concept of consent in the past few decades have got to grips with it as a rich notion. We are increasingly sensitive to consent not as a momentary, atomic, transactional thing, but as a complex idea admitting of various qualities and dimensions. In this paper we note that the recognition of this complexity demands a theoretical framework quite different to those presently extant, and we suggest that the enactive approach is one which offers significant value in this regard. In consonance with arguments made by Laurie Penny about how consent is a continuous and dynamic process, we outline how an enactive approach identifies consent as temporally extended (rather than momentarily transactional), and as affected by the skilfulness of the agents involved, the fitness of community-provided resources to negotiate the consensual relationship over time, and the unfolding of circumstances in the situation in which the joint action is taking place. We argue that the value of an enactive perspective on consent is in highlighting these complexities, and in providing resources to articulate and theorise them in ways that are not open to other current approaches.

Funder

Mary Immaculate College

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Philosophy

Reference52 articles.

1. Alexander, L. (2014). The ontology of consent. Analytic Philosophy, 55(1), 102–113.

2. Alexander, L., Hurd, H. M., & Westen, P. (2016). Consent does not require communication: a reply to Dougherty. Law and Philosophy, 35(6), 655–660.

3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. (V. W. McGee, trans.). Austin, University of Texas Press.

4. Barandiaran, X., & Egbert, M. (2013). Norm-establishing and norm-following in autonomous agency. Artificial Life, 91(2), 1–24.

5. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3