Abstract
AbstractPhilosophical interest in inner speech has grown in recent years. In seeking to understand the phenomenon, many philosophers have drawn heavily on two theories from neighbouring disciplines: Lev Vygotsky’s theory on the development of inner speech in children and a cognitive-scientific theory about speech production. I argue that they have been too uncritical in their acceptance of these theories, which has prevented a proper analysis of inner speech.
Funder
commonwealth government of australia
swiss state secretariat for education, research and innovation
alexander von humboldt-stiftung
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Philosophy
Reference54 articles.
1. Carruthers, P. (2008). The creative action theory of creativity. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind, volume 3: Foundations and the future. Oxford University Press.
2. Carruthers, P. (2009). Action-awareness and the active mind. Philosophical Papers, 38, 133–156.
3. Carruthers, P. (2018). The causes and contents of inner speech. In P. Langland-Hassan & A. Vicente (Eds.), Inner speech: New voices. Oxford University Press.
4. Clowes, R. (2007). A self-regulation model of inner speech and its role in the organisation of human conscious experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14(7), 59–71.
5. Feinberg, I. (1978). Efference copy and corollary discharge: Implications for thinking and its disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 4, 636–640.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献