Abstract
AbstractThe distinction of „understanding“ and „explaining“, formulated by Karl Jaspers in his „General Psychopathology“, has had a lasting effect on psychiatry. As a result, phenomenological, hermeneutic, or psychodynamic approaches have often been accorded only descriptive or epiphenomenal status, while the actual causes of mental illness have been sought in neurobiologically or genetically based explanations. In contrast, this paper defends the explanatory role of understanding and phenomenological approaches. To this end, two levels of explanation are distinguished and shown to be equally justified in principle, namely, motivational explanation at the macro-level and physical explanation at the micro-level. The actual causal role of motivational, i.e., understandable connections is then demonstrated by means of a conception of circular causality, which includes downward causality. Finally, the explanatory role of phenomenological analyses is also shown in psychotic disorders that refuse motivational understanding, using the example of schizophrenic delusion.
Funder
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Philosophy
Reference51 articles.
1. Adams, R. A., Vincent, P., Benrimoh, D., Friston, K. J., & Parr, T. (2021). Everything is connected: Inference and attractors in delusions. Schizophrenia Research (online first) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2021.07.032
2. Berridge, M. J. (2005). Unlocking the secrets of cell signaling. Annual Reviews of Physiology, 67, 1–21
3. Braun, H. A. (2021). Stochasticity versus determinacy in neurobiology: From ion channels to the question of the “free will”. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 15, 39
4. Dennett, D. (1969). Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge
5. Davidson, D. (1980). Actions, Reasons and Causes. Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献