Abstract
AbstractThis paper offers a novel interpretation of Hans Jonas’ analysis of metabolism, the centrepiece of Jonas’ philosophy of organism, in relation to recent controversies regarding the phenomenological dimension of life-mind continuity as understood within ‘autopoietic’ enactivism (AE). Jonas’ philosophy of organism chiefly inspired AE’s development of what we might call ‘the phenomenological life-mind continuity thesis’ (PLMCT), the claim that certain phenomenological features of human experience are central to a proper scientific understanding of both life and mind, and as such central features of all living organisms. After discussing the understanding of PLMCT within AE, and recent criticisms thereof, I develop a reading of Jonas’ analysis of metabolism, in light of previous commentators, which emphasizes its systematicity and transcendental flavour. The central thought is that, for Jonas, the attribution of certain phenomenological features is a necessary precondition for our understanding of the possibility of metabolism, rather than being derivable from metabolism itself. I argue that my interpretation strengthens Jonas’ contribution to AE’s justification for ascribing certain phenomenological features to life across the board. However, it also emphasises the need to complement Jonas’ analysis with an explanatory account of organic identity in order to vindicate these phenomenological ascriptions in a scientific context.
Funder
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
University of St. Andrews
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Philosophy
Reference45 articles.
1. Barandiaran, X. E. (2017). Autonomy and Enactivism: Towards a Theory of Sensorimotor Autonomous Agency. Topoi, 36, 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9365-4
2. Barbaras, R. (2010). Life and exteriority: The problem of metabolism. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. A. Di Paolo (eds.), Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 89–122). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
3. Barrett, N. F. (2017). The Normative Turn in Enactive Theory: An Examination of Its Roots and Implications. Topoi, 36, 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9355-y
4. Clark, A. (2001). Mindware: an introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. New York: Oxford University Press
5. Colombetti, G. (2014). The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献