Proactive control and agency

Author:

Baston RenéORCID

Abstract

AbstractCan agents overcome unconscious psychological influences without being aware of them? Some philosophers and psychologists assume that agents need to be aware of psychological influences to successfully control behavior. The aim of this text is to argue that when agents engage in a proactive control strategy, they can successfully shield their behavior from some unconscious influences. If agents actively check for conflicts between their actions and mental states, they engage in reactive control. For engaging in reactive control, agents need awareness of those mental states which are in conflict with an action. In contrast, if agents are actively maintaining a goal in consciousness, they engage in proactive control. Proactive control does not consist of conflict detection or conflict resolution. I argue that proactive control explains how agents overcome unconscious psychological influences. In doing so, I claim that consciousness is important for engaging in reactive and proactive control.

Funder

deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft

Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Philosophy

Reference73 articles.

1. Baars, B. J. (1997). In the Theater of Consciousness: The Workspace of the Mind by Bernard J. Baars. Oxford University Press

2. Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit Attitudes Can Be Measured. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, & I. Neath (Eds.), The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 117–150). American Psychological Association

3. Barden, J., Maddux, W. W., Petty, R. E., & Brewer, M. B. (2004). Contextual moderation of racial bias: The impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.5

4. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everday life. The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (10 vol., pp. 1–61). Erlbaum

5. Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 361–382). Guilford Press

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3