Cerebral perfusion software: comparative evaluation

Author:

Fagotti CristinaORCID,Colarieti Filippo,Cella Marco,Catalucci Alessia,Anselmi Monica,Arrigoni Francesco,Palumbo Pierpaolo,Bruno Federico,Barile Antonio,Di Cesare Ernesto,Splendiani Alessandra

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Perfusion CT (CTP) is crucial in defining the best treatment strategy for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Several software is available for assessing cerebral perfusion maps, which may show some variability in results. We aim to investigate the agreement between CT perfusion values in acute ischemic stroke of 2 different software (Syngo.via and Icobrain) in estimating ischemic core, ischemic penumbra, and mismatch ratio. Methods 17 patients (10 women, mean age = 79.5 years) with acute stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) were enrolled in our study between August 2022 and March 2023. All patients underwent a CTP scan to determine the best treatment approach: endovascular treatment or systemic fibrinolysis according to DAWN/DEFUSE-3 criteria. All CTP examinations were analyzed using 2 different dedicated software (Syngo.via, Icobrain) and the perfusion values obtained (core, penumbra, mismatch ratio) were compared with each other. A basal CT scan 24 h after treatment was acquired to assess the final infarct volume (FIV) and possible hemorrhagic infarction. Then we compared the true FIV, manually assessed, with the predicted FIV calculated by the two software. Results The values obtained showed that the mean core volumes calculated by Syngo.via and Icobrain did not exhibit any statistically significant differences with a p-value of 0.09. There is no statistically significant difference between the mean penumbra volumes calculated by the two software (p-value = 0.29). There is no statistically significant difference between the mean values of core and penumbra calculated by both software. Furthermore, both Icobrain and Syngo.via gave the same therapeutic indication. Correlation analysis indicated a slightly stronger correlation between the core volume calculated by Icobrain and the FIV (r = 0.98 vs r = 0.94). Both correlations were statistically significant (p =  < 0.001). Conclusion The evaluation of perfusion indices by automated systems may present a certain degree of variability between different software, although they agree on the final therapeutic stratification.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3